1 of 1
Offline
#1)If there’s only one shooter, why did so many eyewitnesses report multiple shooters at the scene?
#2) Why did the local police arrest and hold three suspects in custody, as was widely reported by the media before the story was changed to a “lone shooter?”
#3) Why does the so-called “manifesto” appear to be written by someone far older than 21 years of age? (Answer: The manifesto is a hoax. It was not written by the individual who was arrested as the shooter.)
#4) How does one man kill 20 people and wound another 30 people with a single magazine that only holds 30 rounds? The surveillance photo shows no chest rig, no battle belt and no spare magazines.
#5) If the shooter is on a suicide mission, why does he bother to wear both eye protection and ear protection? Answer: Because he knows he will survive his “mission” and be taken into custody after surrendering to police. It wasn’t a suicide mission at all.
Offline
Easy. It is Texas, home of magic bullets.
Offline
hawaiigar asked:
5 questions that blow apart the narrative
There's a narrative? That's an assertion on your part. You'll have to start by explaining to the rest of us whether there is a narrative, by whom, what is their agenda, who is publicizing said agenda, and so forth. Way before we even get to your "5 questions", you're going to have to sell the rest of us on what on Earth you're talking about.
By the way, the latest news I saw this morning (mentioned by Fox News early morning) is that authorities are still trying to determine if the aforementioned "manifesto" is in fact authored by the arrested shooter.
So if the "official narrative" is that they don't know if this guy wrote that manifesto, I'd say it's way too early to determine any narrative being pushed by anyone, when they flat up say they don't know if this guy wrote whatever it is.
By the way, Haiwaiigar, I'm curious how the various threads on "Muslim sighted at Notre Dame cathedral" went. Actually, I'm pretty sure the accusations you guys pushed went nowhere and had zero facts behind them about a Muslim setting the fire. Despite this, I'm guessing no one pushing those "narrative" theories ever apologized over those "topics", am I right? Not saying we should look at your track record here, but we should look at your track record here before you set off tilting at the next windwill on "5 questions" of any new narrative on any new story.
Just sayin'. You've got a lot of proof to work on before convincing anyone of your latest opportunity, I mean latest tragic shooting.
1 of 1